SofemaOnline.com looks at Maintenance Oversight and Compliance with FAR 25 / CS 25
- Hits: 2536
SofemaOnline - The E-learning Revolution!
SofemaOnline (SOL) is a service provided by Sofema Aviation Services, offering a range of EASA-compliant online video regulatory courses.
SOL is supported by the European Aviation Institute (EAI) an EASA Part 147 approved Maintenance Training Organization (MTO) with Certificate of Approval No RO.147.0003.
An essential role of the Part M CAMO organization is to provide oversight of the 145 process. There are a number of ways to look at this.
Consider the Part M Obligations of Maintenance Oversight
The relationship between the Operator’s Part M and the 145 organization is contractual – which means that the 145 is responsible for delivering the maintenance fully in compliance with all requirements and on completion to provide a CRS for the maintenance that is performed.
The Operator “must” at all costs minimize its exposure and risks including any associated with the maintenance product.
Should anything happen then it is the good name of the operator rather than the maintainer which is damaged.
Following the requirements of the M.A.712 Quality system, The Operators CAMO has a direct responsibility to ensure compliance with the following:
- Monitoring that all activities carried out under Section A, Subpart G of this Annex (Part M) are being performed per the approved procedures
- Monitoring that all contracted maintenance is carried out by the contract
- Monitoring the continued compliance with the requirements of this Part
So where is the exposure? In fact, there is a significant exposure that derives from the standards that the EASA-approved 145 organisation follows.
There are a number of “holes” or exposures – even though EASA has been lobbied many times there are no “specific regulatory requirements associated with the training standard associated with the inspection of the aircraft.
Consider the requirements of CS 25.1707 System Separation; EWIS (See AMC 25.1707)
Put simply systems & wiring do not chafe overnight, it takes a long time for pipes, tubes, and electrical wire to rub together. Typically this is more than sufficient time if the competence of the inspectors is maintained to the highest level.
But what is “the highest level” In fact the 145 organization in the final analysis is left to determine this for itself.
So the challenge thus becomes to train assess evaluate the aircraft inspectors – to maintain the standards and to manage the system in an efficient and effective way.
It therefore becomes a relatively simple task for the Part M Quality System – both in respect of QC & QA to assess whether the 145 organization really has got to grips with the management of Inspection standards.
But how often is this element audited in depth by the operator?
The answer is not often enough and after the event, it is too late of course.
Have questions about our programs, need more information, or want to learn about our exclusive special offers? We’re here to help! Reach out to us at [email protected], and one of our friendly experts will get back to you promptly. Let us guide you in finding the perfect training solution tailored to your needs!